PDF To download article.

UDK 631.17:519.8:502.13

DOI: 10.15507/2658-4123.031.202102.227-240

 

A Forecast Model of the Complex Negative Impact of Agricultural Production Technologies on Water Bodies

 

Igor A. Subbotin
Researcher at the Department of Engineering Ecology of Agricultural Production, Institute for Engineering and Environmental Problems in Agricultural Production ‒ Branch of Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM (3 Filtrovskoye Shosse, Saint Petersburg 196625, Russian Federation), Researcher ID: L-6130-2015, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6189-9385, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Eduard V. Vasilev
Senior Researcher at the Department of Engineering Ecology of Agricultural Production, Institute for Engineering and Environmental Problems in Agricultural Production ‒ Branch of Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM (3 Filtrovskoye Shosse, Saint Petersburg 196625, Russian Federation), Cand.Sc. (Engineering), Researcher ID: C-1304-2018, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Introduction. The purpose of research is to develop a mathematical model for assessing and forecasting the complex negative impacts of agricultural technologies on water bodies. This problem is relevant because of the need to enlarge agricultural enterprises. The created model for forecasting is necessary to make an objective assessment, taking into account the complex effect of machine technologies applied to agricultural production and all biogenic elements that have a negative impact on water bodies.
Materials and Methods. There was used the Spesivtsev – Drozdov method of logical-linguistic modeling, which allows giving expert knowledge a form mathematical model. Four experts were interviewed, and the obtained data became a subject of the regression analysis. The adequacy of the model was confirmed using the coefficient of determination and Fisher’s test.
Results. A hierarchical system of 6 factors and 14 sub-factors was formed, including both the applied machine technologies and the management decisions on the matter. There was created a model containing a polynomial equation reflecting the influence of factors on the level of negative impact of technologies and equations that determine the influence of sub-factors on factors.
Discussion and Conclusion. The created model can be used for practical purposes to support making decisions for planning, forecasting and selecting scenarios to modernize agricultural enterprises. The model equations make it possible to understand the significance of factors and sub-factors affecting the level of negative impact (diffuse load) on water bodies. This allows us to choose more effective ways to reduce the negative impact by choosing the most significant factors and/or sub-factors as objects of management.

Keywords: agricultural technologies, environmental assessment, modeling, forecasting, engineering ecology, complex negative impact

Acknowlegments: The authors express their gratitude to the anonymous reviewers.

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

For citation: Subbotin I.A., Vasilev E.V. A Forecast Model of the Complex Negative Impact of Agricultural Production Technologies on Water Bodies. Inzhenerernyye tekhnologii i sistemy = Engineering Technologies and Systems. 2021; 31(2):227-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2658-4123.031.202102.227-240

Contribution of the authors:
I. A. Subbotin – literature review, methodology, results, discussion and conclusions.
E. V. Vasilev – formulating the problems, setting the objectives, defining the criteria, collecting expert data, discussing and making conclusions.

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 02.09.2020; approved after reviewing 21.10.2020;
accepted for publication 06.11.2020

 

REFERENCES

1. Bayramukova S.R., Mesharova V.Yu. [The Impact of Agricultural Enterprises on the Environment]. Strategiya ustoychivogo razvitiya regionov Rossii = Strategy for Sustainable Development of Russian Regions. 2015; (29):52-55. Available at: https://clck.ru/U2G3o (accessed 01.09.2020). (In Russ.)

2. Stepanova L.P., Tsyganok Ye.N., Tikhoykina I.M. [Ecological Problems of Agriculture]. Vestnik OrelGAU = Vestnik OrelGAU (Bulletin of Agrarian Science). 2012; (1):11-17. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekologicheskie-problemy-zemledeliya (accessed 01.09.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

3. Afanassiev V.N., Kozlova N.P., Afanassiev A.V. Reducing Negative Environmental Impact of Machine-Based Technologies in Agriculture. Tekhnologii i tekhnicheskie sredstva mekhanizirovannogo proizvodstva produktsii rastenievodstva i zhivotnovodstva = Technologies and Technical Means for Mechanized Production of Crop and Livestock Products. 2013; (84):133-141. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/ item.asp?id=22677100 (accessed 01.09.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

4. Popov V.D., Maksimov D.A., Bryukhanov A.Yu. Agricultural Production Ecology: Problems and Solutions. Selskohozajstvennye mashiny i tehnologii = Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2016; (3):43-48. Available at: https://www.vimsmit.com/jour/article/view/138 (accessed 01.09.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

5. Werf H.M.G., Petit J. Evaluation of the Environmental Impact of Agriculture at the Farm Level: A Comparison and Analysis of 12 Indicator-Based Methods. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2002; 93(1-3):131-145. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00354-1

6. Nooteboom S., Wieringa K. Comparing Strategic Environmental Assessment and Integrated Environmental Assessment. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 2012; 1(4):441-457. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S146433329900034X

7. Agelebe D., Prityi M., Nielsen J. Environmental Impact Assessment Systems. In: K.W. Junker, ed. Environmental Law Across Cultures. 1st ed. London: Routledge; 2019. 41 p. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi. org/10.4324/9780429397615

8. Orlova I.V., Sharabarina S.N. [Assessment of Agricultural Impact on Natural Systems: Theoretical and Methodological Approaches]. Geografiya i prirodnye resursy = Geography and Natural Resources. 2015; (4):26-32. Available at: http://www.izdatgeo.ru/journal.php?action=output_more&id=3&lang_num =1&year=2015&issue=4&nodoi=1&page=26 (accessed 01.09.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

9. Canter L.W. Environmental Impact of Agricultural Production Activities. 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1986. 400 p. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351071796

10. Fletcher P., Kelble Ch., Nuttle W., Kiker G. Using the Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Framework to Build Consensus and Transfer Information to Managers. Ecological Indicators. 2014; 44:11-25. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.03.024

11. Brentrup F., Küsters J., Kuhlmann H., Lammel J. Environmental Impact Assessment of Agricultural Production Systems Using the Life Cycle Assessment Methodology: I. Theoretical Concept of a LCA Method Tailored to Crop Production. European Journal of Agronomy. 2004; 20(3):247-264. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(03)00024-8

12. Bryukhanov A.Yu., Shalavina Ye.V., Vasilev E.V., Oblomkova N.S. Indicators of Negative Environmental Impact in Agri-Food Production. Tekhnologii i tekhnicheskie sredstva mekhanizirovannogo proizvodstva produktsii rastenievodstva i zhivotnovodstva = Technologies and Technical Means for Mechanized Production of Crop and Livestock Products. 2019; (2):250-260. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/0131-5226-2019-10170

13. Sousa P., Gomes D., Formigo N. Ecosystem Services in Environmental Impact Assessment. Energy Reports. 2020; 6(1):466-471. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.09.009

14. Wu J., Chang I.-S. Environmental Impact Assessment. In: Environmental Management in China. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 35-62. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4894-9_4

15. Su D., Smith J., Wu Y., Ren Z. Environmental Impact Assessment of Farming with Combined Methods of Life Cycle Assessment and Farm Carbon Calculator. In: D. Su, ed. Sustainable Product Development. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 249-270. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39149-2_12

16. Gomiero T., Pimentel D., Paoletti M.G. Environmental Impact of Different Agricultural Management Practices: Conventional vs. Organic Agriculture. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 2011; 30(1-2):95-124. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.554355

17. Ferro V. Soil Sediment Loading and Related Environmental Impacts from Farms. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedias. 2017. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.267

18. Briukhanov A., Vasilev E., Kozlova N., et al. Environmental Assessment of Livestock Farms in the Context of BAT System Introduction in Russia. Journal of Environmental Management. 2019; 246:283-288. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.105

19. Li Y. Agricultural Production Mode and Its Environmental Impact. In: Y. Zhang, ed. Environmental Economics Research and China’s Green Development Strategy. 2020. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi. org/10.1142/9789811202919_0006

20. Karayel D., Sarauskis E. Environmental Impact of No-Tillage Farming. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management. 2019; 75(1). 6 p. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.75.1.20861

21. Gridnev P.I., Gridneva T.T., Shvedov A.A. Methodology of Manure Cleaning and Preparation for Using Systems’ Ecological Assessment. Vestnik VNIIMZh = Journal of VNIIMZH. 2018; 2:159-167. Available at: http://www.vniimzh.ru/images/material/Magazines/n30.pdf (accessed 01.09.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

22. Briukhanov A.Yu., Trifanov A.V., Spesivtsev A.V., et al. Logical-Linguistic Model of Farm Organic Waste Recycling. In: 2017 XX IEEE International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM). St. Petersburg: IEEE; 2017. p. 265-267. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SCM.2017.7970556

23. Peigné J., Girardin P. Environmental Impacts of Farm-Scale Composting Practices. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 2004; 153:45-68. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WATE.0000019932.04020.b6

24. Safa G., Najiba C., El Houda B.N., et al. Assessment of Urban Groundwater Vulnerability in Arid Areas: Case of Sidi Bouzid Aquifer (Central Tunisia). Journal of African Earth Sciences. 2020; 168. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2020.103849

25. Novikov N.N., Sorokin N.T., Grachev N.N., et al. Environmental Hazards and Labour Protection in Agriculture with the Organic Farming Development: A Model of Integrated Assessment. Yug Rossii: ekologiya, razvitie = South of Russia: Ecology, Development. 2019; 14(2):99-119. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2019-2-99-119

26. Mulyk T. Environmental Impact Assessment of Agriculture: A Regional Aspect. Modern Economics. 2020; 19:135-142. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.V19(2020)-22

27. Li Sh., Huang B., Zhao F., et al. Environmental Impact Assessment of Agricultural Production in Chongming Ecological Island. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2019; 24:1937-1947. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01614-w

28. O’Higgins T., Farmer A., Daskalov G., et al. Achieving Good Environmental Status in the Black Sea: Scale Mismatches in Environmental Management. Ecology and Society. 2014; 19(3):54. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06707-190354

29. Mushtaq B., Bandh S.A., Shafi S. Environmental Education and Environmental Impact Assessment. In: Environmental Management. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 95-148. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3813-1_3

30. Yakunin D.A., Musaelyan S.M. [Projections of Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture in the Lower Volga Region]. Izvestiya Nizhnevolzhskogo agrouniversitetskogo kompleksa: nauka i vysshee professionalnoe obrazovanie = News of the Nizhnevolzhsk Agro-University Complex: Science and Higher Professional Education. 2011; (2):80-86. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16452689 (accessed 01.09.2020). (In Russ.)

31. Briukhanov A.Yu., Trifanov A.V., Spesivtsev A.V., et al. Logical-Linguistic Modeling in Addressing Agro-Environmental Challenges. In: 2016 XIX IEEE International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM). St. Petersburg: IEEE; 2016. p. 164-166. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SCM.2016.7519716

32. Briukhanov A.Yu., Subbotin I.A., Timofeev E.V., Erk A.F. Energy and Environment Assessment of Agricultural Application of Power Generating Sources. Inzhenernyye tekhnologii i sistemy = Engineering Technologies and Systems. 2019; 29(3):366-382. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2658-4123.029.201903.366-382

  

Лицензия Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Joomla templates by a4joomla