UDK 631.354
DOI: 10.15507/2658-4123.031.202102.188-206
Studying the Normal Operation of Grain Harvesters within the Warranty Period
Vladimir A. Komarov
Professor of the Chair of Technical Service of Machines, National Research Mordovia State University (68 Bolshevistskaya St., Saransk 430005, Russian Federation), D.Sc. (Engineering), Researcher ID: G-8673-2018, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1910-2923, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Mihail I. Kurashkin
Postgraduate Student of the Chair of Technical Service of Machines, National Research Mordovia State University (68 Bolshevistskaya St., Saransk 430005, Russian Federation), Researcher ID: B-1295-2019, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3473-8081, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Introduction. Grain harvesters are used for no more than two months within a year. They must have maximum operating reliability, since even short downtime during the harvesting period result in large crop losses. The purpose of the study is to identify the causes of combine harvester failures within the warranty period.
Materials and Methods. Identifying consequences of failures and ensuring the reliability of grain harvesters are based on an improved classification of failures. In the process of studying, there have been proposed the ways to solve the problem of combine harvester downtime based on the analysis of the time for grain harvester troubleshooting. The category of severity of failure consequences was taken into account.
Results. Through monitoring in the period from 2018 to 2020, there were found failures of units and systems of grain harvesters with low reliability indexes within the warranty period. Most of the failures (59.2%) were found in Russian-manufactured combines, of which operational failures are 55.9%, structural failures – 26.7%, and production failures – 17.4%. The general patterns of changes in the average time for combine troubleshooting have been determined. A geometric model of a detail for the trouble-free operation of combines (header auger shaft) was created. The finite element analysis (ANSYS) was used to identify parts, which are subject to maximum workload. There have been identified units and parts, which fail to function within the warranty period, because of design and technological defects.
Discussion and Conclusion. In order to reduce the time to find the consequences of failures, it is necessary to create a more extensive network of enterprises providing a wide range of services, improve the organization of technical service and expand direct links with the manufacturers of equipment in order to respond quickly and make the necessary design and technological decisions.
Keywords: grain harvester, operation, warranty period, structural and technological defect, failure, time for troubleshooting
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
For citation: Komarov V.A., Kurashkin M.I. Studying the Normal Operation of Grain Harvesters within the Warranty Period. Inzhenerernyye tekhnologii i sistemy = Engineering Technologies and Systems. 2021; 31(2):188-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2658-4123.031.202102.188-206
Contribution of the authors:
V. A. Komarov – scientific guidance, formulating the main directions of the study, developing the theoretical background, finalizing the text, drawing general conclusions and literary analysis.
M. I. Kurashkin – preparing the initial version of the article, monitoring the reliability of combine harvesters, processing the study results, visualization.
All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Received 02.03.2021; approved after reviewing 01.04.2021;
accepted for publication 12.04.2021
REFERENCES
1. Shepelyov S.D., Cherkasov Yu.B., Shepelyov V.D. The Justification of Idle Time for Elimination of Consequences of Combine Harvesters Technical Failure. Vestnik KrasGAU = Bulletin of KrasGAU. 2017; (5):45-51. Available at: http://www.kgau.ru/vestnik/2017_5/content/8.pdf (accessed 14.02.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Zubko V., Roubik H., Zamora O., Khvorost T. Analysis and Forecast of Performance Characteristics of Combine Harvesters. Agronomy Research. 2018; 16(5):2282-2302. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.18.212
3. Korolev A.Ye. [Comparative Reliability of Grain Harvesters]. NovaUm.Ru. 2019; (17):26-28. Available at: http://novaum.ru/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Выпуск-17.pdf (accessed 14.02.2021). (In Russ.)
4. Smilik V.A., Kipriyanov F.A., Vodolasko A.N. Assessments of Technical and Technological Reliability of Combine Harvesters and Self-Propelled Foragers. Izvestiya Mezhdunarodnoy akademii agrarnogo obrazovaniya = News of the International Academy of Public Education. 2018; 41(1):49-55. Available at: https://maaorus.ru/assets/files/journals/izvestiya-maao-vypusk-41-tom-1.pdf (accessed 14.02.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Belomestnikh V.A., Perevalov V.M., Losev L.V. Reliability of Grain Combine Harvesters AСROS 580 at Operation under the Conditions of Irkutsk Region. Vestnik IrGSHA. 2017; (79):139-144. Available at: http://www.igsha.ru/science/files/v79.pdf (accessed 14.02.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6.Belomestnykh V.A., Ilyin P.I., Rozhkov D.M. Assessment of the Reliability of Grain Corner Elements Combine “Vector 410” at Operation in the Garntian Period. Vestnik IrGSHA. 2017; (80):61-68. Available at: http://vestnik.irsau.ru/files/v80.pdf (accessed 14.02.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Lebedev A.T., Pavlyuk R.V., Zakharin A.V., Lebedev P.A. Research of the Emerging Failures and the Time of Their Elimination Between the Main Systems of Grain Harvesting Combines. Tekhnicheskiy servis mashin = Technical Service of Machines. 2019; (3):33-39. Available at: http://vimtsm.ru/?p=234 (accessed 14.02.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Kryukova N.S., Ostretsov V.N. Grain Combine Reliability Assessment Systems. Mezhdunarodnyy tekhniko-ekonomicheskiy zhurnal = The International Technical-Economic Journal. 2020; (1):22-28. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.34286/1995-4646-2020-70-1-22-28
9. Subochev S.V., Nemtsev A.Ye., Kopteva I.V. The Influence of Basic Indexes of Reliability on the Efficiency of Grain Harvesters. Vestnik NGAU (Novosibirskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet) = Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2014; 2(31):157-164. Available at: https://vestngau.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/245/62# (accessed 14.02.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
10. Erokhin G.N., Sazonov S.N., Konovsky V.V. On the Reliability of Modern Combine Harvester. Vestnik Michurinskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Michurin State Agrarian University Bulletin. 2013; (6):59-63. Available at: http://www.mgau.ru/sciense/journal/PDF_files/6-2013.pdf (accessed 14.02.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. Shepelev S.D., Plaksin A.M., Cherkasov Yu.B. Service Life and Seasonal Loading Influencing the Indicators of Operational Reliability of Combine Harvesters. APK Rossii = Agro-Industrial Complex of Russia. 2016; 75(1):122-126. Available at: https://rusapk.sursau.ru/upload/iblock/dc9/apk-75.pdf (accessed 14.02.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
12. Komarov V.A., Nuyanzin E.A., Kurashkin M.I. Study of the Process of Putting into Storage of Combine and Self-Propelled Machinery in the Regional Agribusiness. Tekhnika i oborudovanie dlya sela = Machinery and Equipment for Rural Area. 2019; (5):32-36. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.33267/2072-9642-2019-5-32-36
13. Komarov V.A., Nuyanzin Ye.A., Kurashkin M.I. Storage of Complex Agricultural Machinery in Mordovia. Selskiy Mekhanizator = Rural Mechanic. 2019; (9):38-40. Available at: http://selmech.msk.ru/919.html (accessed 14.02.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
14. Komarov V.A., Kurashkin M.I. [Study of Failures of Acros-595 Harvesters during the Warranty Period]. Selskiy Mekhanizator = Rural Mechanic. 2018; (6):38-39. Available at: http://selmech.msk.ru/618.html (accessed 14.02.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
15. Komarov V.A. Research of Technical Service Enterprises for Promoting Equipment Reliability (Case Study of Agro-Industrial Complex of the Republic of Mordovia). Vestnik Mordovskogo universiteta = Mordovia University Bulletin. 2018; 28(2):222-238. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/0236-2910.028.201802.222-238
16. Komarov V.A., Salmin V.V., Kurashkin M.I. Study of Master Plans of Technical Service Enterprises in Agricultural Sector. Inzhenerernyye tekhnologii i sistemy = Engineering Technologies and Systems. 2019; 29(4):560-577. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2658-4123.029.201904.560-577
17. Shepelev S., Shepelev V., Cherkasov Yu. Differentiation of the Seasonal Loading of Combine Harvester Depending on Its Technical Readiness. Procedia Engineering. 2015; 129:161-165. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.026
18. Pristavka M., Kristof K., Findura P. Reliability Monitoring of Grain Harvester. Agronomy Research. 2017; 15(3):817-829. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Koloman_Kristof/publication/ 317304867_Reliability_
19. Egorov A.V., Zubova E.V., Vakhrushev V.V. Assessing the Power Transmission Reliability Indicators of a John Deere 9600 Combine Harvester. APK Rossii = Agro-Industrial Complex of Russia. 2015; 73:41-48. Available at: https://rusapk.sursau.ru/upload/iblock/87c/apk-73.pdf (accessed 16.02.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
20. Krupin A.Ye., Lisunov Ye.A., Kalashov A.A. The Reliability Analysis of Combine Harvester Don-1500 B. Vestnik NGIEI = Bulletin NGIEI. 2018; (2):42-53. Available at: http://vestnik.ngiei.ru/?page_id=1601 (accessed 16.02.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
21. Chepurin G.E. The Principle of Identity of Conditions for Zonal Tests of Grain Harvesters. Sibirskiy vestnik selskokhozyaystvennoy nauki = Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2020; 50(3):83-93. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2020-3-9 (accessed 14.02.2021).
22. Lomakin S.G., Berdyshev V.Ye. Assessing Technical Performance Level of Russian “Rostselmash” Combines. Vestnik FGOU VPO “Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy agroinzhenernyy universitet imeni V.P. Goryachkina” = Moscow Goryachkin Agroengineering University Bulletin. 2017; (6):34-42. Available at: https://clck.ru/UAjXC (accessed 16.02.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
23. Shepelev S.D., Cherkasov Yu.B. Idle Time Coefficient of Grain Collectors as an Integrated Indicator of Technical Failure. Agrarnyy Vestnik Urala = Agrarian Bulletin of the Ural. 2017; (7):52-57. Available at: http://avu.usaca.ru/media/BAhbBlsHOgZmSSIoMjAxNy8xMS8xNS8xNF8zMF81Nl83
24. Pavlyuk R.V., Lebedev A.T., Zhevora Y.I., Zubenko E.V. The Reliability Analysis of Combined Harvesters in the Usual Conditions of Operation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020; 488. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/488/1/012033
25. Špokas L., Adamčuk V., Bulgakov V., Nozdrovický L. The Experimental Research of Combine Harvesters. Research in Agricultural Engineering. 2016; 62(3):106-112. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi. org/10.17221/16/2015-RAE
26. Tkachev D.A., Trukhanov K.Yu., Shatalov M.I. Import of a Solid Model from the Compas-3D CAD-System to an ANSYS CAE-System. Elektronnyy zhurnal: nauka, tekhnika i obrazovanie = Electronic Journal: Science, Technology, and Education. 2017; (4). Available at: http://nto-journal.ru/search/ keywords/1392/ (accessed 16.02.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
27. Abbasov A.E. Converting Three-Dimensional Computer Geometric Models for Optimization of Simulated Devices’ Parameters. Kompyuternye issledovaniya i modelirovanie = Computer Research and Modeling. 2015; 7(2):81-91. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20537/2076-7633-2015-7-1-81-91
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.