PDF To download article.

DOI: 10.15507/2658-4123.26363.644-661

UDK 631.312.02+631.51:004.9

 

Parameters of the Digital Twin Model of Peas for Modeling Using the Discrete Element Method

 

Imad R. Antypas
Cand.Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor of the Department of Fundamentals of Machine Design, Don State Technical University (1 Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don 344000, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8141-9529, Researcher ID: O-4789-2018, Scopus ID: 57191988834, SPIN-code: 7371-0223, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Abstract
Introduction. Subsoilers operating in rocky soils are subjected to high dynamic and shock loads, leading to damage to working bodies, reduced reliability, and decreased productivity. Traditional mechanical protection systems fail to provide an adaptive response to overloads.
Aim of the Study. The article is aimed at designing and evaluating experimentally the effectiveness of an intelligent closed-loop hydraulic system for automatic protection of a subsoiler against shock loads in rocky soils.
Materials and Methods. The article presents a hydraulic schematic and a physical model of the implement. The system comprises a pump, a pilot-operated check valve, a four-way electro-hydraulic directional valve, a pressure sensor, a double-acting cylinder, and a relief valve. Control is implemented via a closed loop with a draft force threshold of 28 kN. Performance was evaluated using C++ simulation, field trials with MATLAB data acquisition, and comparative analysis with a spring safety system.
Results. Simulations and field trials confirmed the control logic functionality. Compared to the spring system, the hydraulic system demonstrated a 10 % weight reduction, a 11 % higher field performance, a 14 % lower hourly fuel consumption, and a 40 % faster response time (from 3.0 to 1.8 s). There was determined a linear correlation between system pressure and draft force validating the component selection. The automatic response reduces mechanical loads on the frame and working body, while smooth valve control minimizes harmful transients.
Conclusion. The developed hydraulic protection system is effective and technically feasible. It provides automatic protection of the subsoiler under overload conditions, reducing mechanical stresses. The mathematical analysis has confirmed the component selection correctness, and closed-loop control enhances reliability. The system has potential for further development with the use of advanced electronic control systems and digital sensors.

Keywords: hydraulic circuit, rocky soil, plow, valve, tillage, reliability (safety), computer simulation

Conflict of interest: The author declare no conflict of interest.

For citation: Antypas I.R. Design and Evaluation of an Intelligent Hydraulic Protection System for Subsoiler Plows in Rocky Soil. Engineering Technologies and Systems. 2026;36(3):644–661. https://doi.org/10.15507/2658-4123.26363.644-661

The author has read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 23.01.2026;
revised 13.03.2026;
accepted 16.03.2026

 

REFERENCES

  1. Roeber J.B.W., Pitla S.K., Kocher M.F., Luck J.D., Hoy R.M. Tractor Hydraulic Power Data Acquisition System. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2016;(127):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.05.012
  2. Frosina E., Senatore A., Buono D., Monacelli G., Pintone F. Study of the Performance of the Hydraulic Circuit of an Agricultural Machine with a Lumped Parameter Approach. International Review on Modelling and Simulations. 2017;10(1):26–36. https://doi.org/10.15866/iremos.v10i1.11213
  3. Luo Z., Wang J., Wu J., Zhang S., Chen Z., Xie B. Research on a Hydraulic Cylinder Pressure Control Method for Efficient Traction Operation in Electro‑Hydraulic Hitch System of Electric Tractors. Agriculture. 2023;13(8):1555. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081555
  4. Miller A.P., Pugin K.G. Diagnostics of Hydraulic Cylinders of Road Building Machines using Hydraulic Support. Tractors and Agricultural Machinery. 2023;90(6):551–559. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17816/0321-4443-568992
  5. Pugin K.G., Shayakbarov I.E. Ensuring Reliability of Hydraulic Systems of Road Construction Machines. Tractors and Agricultural Machinery. 2025;92(2):176–184. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17816/0321-4443-630654
  6. Bychenin A.P., Volodko O.S., Bazhutov D.N. Hydraulic System for Agricultural Tractors Adapted to Alternative Fluids. In: Bio Web of Conferences: International Scientific-Practical Conference “Agriculture and Food Security: Technology, Innovation, Markets, Human Resources” (FIES 2020). Kazan: Kazan State Agrarian University; 2020. p. 00056. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20202700056
  7. Pryadkin V.I., Kolyadin P.A. Vibration Loading of Booms Ofaself-Propelled Sprayer with Ultra-Low Pressure Tires. Tractors and Agricultural Machinery. 2023;90(6):543–550. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17816/0321-4443-567796
  8. Sychev D.V., Trushin N.N., Rednikov S.N. Evolution and Improvement of Hydraulic Drives for Vehicles and Stationary Equipment. Izvestiya Tula State University. 2023;(9):39–40. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://elibrary.ru/ctpudv
  9. Popov A.Y. Simulation Modeling of the Volumetric Hydraulic Drive. Tractors and Agricultural Machinery. 2018;85(3):45–53. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17816/0321-4443-66397
  10. Wang L., Wang Y., Dai D., Wang X., Wang S. Review of electro-hydraulic Hitch System Control Method of Automated Tractors. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. 2021;14(3):1–11. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20211403.6175
  11. Sun X., Song Y., Lu Z., Deng X. Research on a Coordinated Control Method of Tractor Electro- Hydraulic Hitch Tillage Depth and Travel Speed Based on Optimal Overall Efficiency and Economic Performance. Agriculture. 2025;15(21):2232. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15212232
  12. Navone A., Martini M., Chiaberge M. Autonomous Robotic Pruning in Orchards and Vineyards: A Review. Smart Agricultural Technology. 2025;(12):101283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.101283
  13. Werner L., Eyschen P., Costello S., Micarelli P., Hutter M. Calibrated Dynamic Modeling for Force and Payload Estimation in Hydraulic Machinery. Construction Robotics. 2025;(9):26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41693-025-00169-7
  14. Wrat G., Das J. Energy Saving in Off‑Road Vehicles Using Leakage Compensation Technique. Preprint. 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.20926
  15. Tian X., Guo X., Stump P., Vacca A., Fiorati S., Pintore F. A Pressure Control Method for Increasing the Energy Efficiency of the Hydraulic System Powering Agricultural Implements. Journal of Sustainable Energy Engineering. 2024;238(6):176–1088. https://doi.org/10.1177/09596518241227250
  16. Korchagina M.V., Stepanov V.N., Kireev S.O., Lebedev A.R. Investigation of Parameters Influencing the Establishment of Hydrostatic Mode in the Crosshead-Guide Assembly of High-Pressure Plunger Pump. Advanced Engineering Research. 2024;24(4):316–327. https://doi.org/10.23947/2687-1653-2024-24-4-316-327
  17. Zenin A.R., Rybak A.T., Beskopylny A.N., Pelipenko A.Yu., Serdyukova Yu.A. Testing Bench for Reciprocating Hydraulic Cylinders with Energy Recovery: Structure, Simulation, and Calculation Advanced Engineering Research. 2024;24(4):347–359. https://doi.org/10.23947/2687-1653-2024-24-4-347-359
  18. Costa G.K., Sepehri N. Understanding Overall Efficiency of Hydrostatic Pumps and Motors. International Journal of Fluid Power. 2018;19(2):106–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14399776.2018.1476306
  19. Penglong Z., Liu J., Wu W.W. Dynamic Analysis and Model Predictive Control of Excavator’s Working Device. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 2022;(2195):012039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2195/1/012039

 

Licensed under a Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.