PDF To download article.

DOI: 10.15507/2658-4123.035.202501.121-138

 

Optimizing the Parameters of a Universal Unit for Fodder Grinding

 

Zakir V. Quliyev
Head of the Mechanization and Automation of Technological Processes in Animal Husbandry Laboratory, Scientific Research Institute “Agromechanics”, Azerbaijan State Agrarian University (450 Ataturk Ave., Ganja Az2000, Azerbaijan), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6090-1853, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Kamal H. Yaqubov
Cand.Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor, Leading Researcher of the Mechanization and Automation of Technological Processes in Animal Husbandry Laboratory, Scientific Research Institute “Agromechanics”, Azerbaijan State Agrarian University (450 Ataturk Ave., Ganja Az2000, Azerbaijan), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1426-5581, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Elman M. Aliev
Senior Researcher of the Mechanization and Automation of Technological Processes in Animal Husbandry Laboratory, Scientific Research Institute “Agromechanics”, Azerbaijan State Agrarian University (450 Ataturk Ave., Ganja Az2000, Azerbaijan), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5371-2667, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Abstract
Introduction. The diversity of the fodder base and livestock in farming enterprises requires various processing lines and technological tools for fodder preparation. Most commonly, a high cost of these technological tools makes their use economically unfeasible. Therefore, an urgent task is to create compact technological tools for mechanizing the main processes of fodder preparation in farming enterprises.
Aim of the Study. The study is aimed at investigating the main structural-and-technological factors affecting the fodder grinding by a hammer-segment grinding tool with more efficient energy consumption indicators.
Materials and Methods. The subject of the study is an experimental setup of a universal grinder with a combined hammer-segment grinding tool. During the study, optimization criteria were found and key factors influencing the grinding process were identified. There was investigated the influence of key factors, such as the rotor rotation speed and the rate of raw material feeding into the grinding chamber, on such optimization criteria as energy consumption and grinding process quality. The experimental studies were analyzed to determine the optimal combination of parameters. During the experiments, the rotor rotation speed was adjusted through changing the supply voltage frequency and the feeding of raw material of a specific mass was carried out at regular intervals. The quality of grinding was determined by the granulometric composition and the average length of the fodder particles, while the energy consumption of the grinding process was measured using an alternating current power meter. To construct a mathematical model, there was used a central composite rotatable design of the second order for two factors.
Results. Based on the obtained data, there have been identified optimal parameter combinations for effective fodder grinding in accordance with zootechnical requirements and at minimal energy consumption for the grinding process.
Discussion and Conclusion. The main factor affecting the energy consumption of the grinding process is the fodder supply into the grinding chamber. The primary reason for the increase in energy consumption is the increase in grinding force in each segment of the working tool caused by increasing the density of fodder passing through the grinding tool per each unit of time. The data obtained during the experimental study make it possible to optimize the working process of the developed universal grinder for fodder grinding to feed cattle in livestock farms.

Keywords: coarse feeds, grain feeds, root and tuber crops, grinding process, energy consumption of the process, grinding chamber, grinding tool

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

For citation: Quliyev Z.V., Yaqubov K.G., Aliev E.M. Optimizing the Parameters of a Universal Unit for Fodder Grinding. Engineering Technologies and Systems. 2025;35(1):121–138. https://doi.org/10.15507/2658-4123.035.202501.121-138

Authors contribution:
Z. V. Kuliev – conducting the study, specifically performing the experiments and collecting data; preparing the manuscript: critical analysis of the draft manuscript, making comments and corrections by members of the research team including at the pre- and post-publication stages.
K. G. Yakubov – conducting the study, specifically performing the experiments and collecting data; preparing the manuscript, specifically visualizing the study results and the data obtained.
E. M. Aliev – conducting the study, specifically performing the experiments and collecting data; preparing the manuscript, specifically visualizing the study results and the data obtained.

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 25.10.2024;
revised 08.11.2024;
accepted 15.11.2024

 

REFERENCES

  1. Chernovol M., Sviren M., Kisiliov R. Study of the Process of Preparing Feeding Mixtures Using the Composite Mixer. Agricultural Science and Practice. 2018;5(1):17–22. https://doi.org/10.15407/agrisp5.01.017
  2. Atanov I.V., Kapustin I.V., Grinchenko V.A., Gritsay D.I., Kapustina E.I. Improving Efficiency of Feeding Cattle. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2016;7(4):1927–1932. Available at: https://www.rjpbcs.com/pdf/2016_7(4)/%5b248%5d.pdf (accessed 25.08.2024).
  3. VandeHaar M.J. Feeding and Breeding for a More Efficient Cow. WCDS Advances in Dairy Technology. 2018;26:17–30. Available at: https://clck.ru/3GbgWF (accessed 25.08.2024).
  4. Morozov N.M., Rasskazov A.N. The Direction of Animal Husbandry Mechanization on the Small Forms of Hausehold. Vestnik Vserossijskogo Nauchno-Issledovatel’skogo Instituta Mekhanizacii Zhivotnovodstva. 2017;2(26). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://clck.ru/3Gbgqe (accessed 24.08.2024).
  5. Lepshina A.I., Belousov S.V. Means of Small Mechanization as a Basis of Modern PFF and PBF in Small Forms of Management. Scientific Journal of KubSAU. 2015;109. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: http://ej.kubagro.ru/2015/05/pdf/24.pdf (accessed 24.08.2024).
  6. Solonshchikov P.N., Kosolapov E.V. Improvement and Increase of Efficiency of Technological Process of Preparation and Distribution of Fodder on Farms Cattle. Bulletin NGIEI. 2018;5(84):54‒66. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://vestnik.ngiei.ru/?page_id=1627 (accessed 24.08.2024).
  7. Laretin N.A., Shpakov A.S. [Organization of Specialized Feed Production in Livestock Farms of the Dairy Sector of the Russian Non-Chernozem Region]. Vestnik VNIIMZH. 2015;2(18):169–177. (In Russ.) EDN: TZBBUX
  8. Laretin N.A. [Features of Modernization and Creation of a Sustainable Feed Base for Dairy Cattle Breeding in the Non-Chernozem Zone of the Russian Federation]. Vestnik VNIIMZH. 2011;3(3). (In Russ.) Available at: https://clck.ru/3GcRtu (accessed 23.08.2024).
  9. Eshkobilova M.Sh., Kholmurodova Z.D. Scientific Importance of Modern Methods of Feed Production and their Quality Indicators. Universum: Tekhnicheskie Nauki. 2024;3(120):12–15. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://7universum.com/ru/tech/archive/item/17025 (accessed 23.08.2024).
  10. Bylatov S.Yu. [Improving the Efficiency of Feed Preparation by Improving the Design and Technological Process of Feed Preparation Machines]. Permskij Agrarnyj Vestnik. 2017;1(17). (In Russ.) Available at: https://clck.ru/3GcTXT (accessed 25.08.2024).
  11. Solonshchikov P.N., Moshonkin A.M., Doronin M.S. Improvement of Machinery and Equipment in the Production of Fodder. Bulletin NGIEI. 2017;9(76);64–76. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: ZJTXET
  12. Pretty J., Benton T.G., Bharucha Z.P., Dicks L.V., Flora C.B., Godfray H.J., et al. Global Assessment of Agricultural System Redesign for Sustainable Intensification. Nature Sustainability. 2018;1:441–446. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0114-0
  13. Zhao C., Liu B., Piao S., Wang X., Lobell D.B., Huang Y., et al. Temperature Increase Reduces Global Yields of Major Crops in Four Independent Estimates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017;114(35):9326–9331. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701762114
  14. Van Loo E.J., Caputo V., Nayga R.M., Meullenet J.-F., Ricke S.C. Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Organic Chicken Breast: Evidence from Choice Experiment. Food Quality and Preference. 2011;22(7):603–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.02.003
  15. Lowder S.K., Skoet J., Raney T. The Number, Size, and Distribution of Farms, Smallholder Farms, and Family Farms Worldwide. World Development. 2016;87:16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.041
  16. Herrero M., Thornton P.K., Mason-D’Croz D., Palmer J., Benton T.G., Bodirsky B.L., et al. Innovation Can Accelerate the Transition Towards a Sustainable Food System. Nature Food. 2020;1:266–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-0074-1
  17. Ayugin N., Isaychev V., Khalimov R., Semashkin N. Method and Results of Studying the Influence of Grinder Knife Parameters on Specific Work of Feed Cutting. BIO Web of Conferences. International Scientific-Practical Conference “Agriculture and Food Security: Technology, Innovation, Markets, Human Resources”. 2021;37:00022. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20213700022
  18. Novikov V.V., Zoteev V.S., Kamysheva O.A., Gretsov A.S. [Results of Production Testing of an Experimental Root Crop Grinder]. Izvestia OSAU. 2017;2(64):74–76. (In Russ.) EDN: YMXGRH
  19. Novikov V.V., Mishanin A.L., Uspenskaya I.V., Nikitin V.A., Kamysheva O.A. [Universal Screw Feed Grinder]. Patent 142728 Russian Federation. 2014 June 27. (In Russ.) EDN: YHFCWX
  20. Marczuk A., Blicharz-Kania A., Savinykh P.A., Isupov A.Y., Palichyn A.V., Ivanov I.I. Studies of a Rotary-Centrifugal Grain Grinder Using a Multifactorial Experimental Design Method. Sustainability. 2019;11(19):5362. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195362
  21. Abalikhin A.M., Barabanov D.V., Krupin A.V., Mukhanov N.V. Evaluation of Performance Efficiency of Centrifugal Feed Grain Grinder. AgroEkoEngineering. 2024;1(118):43–57. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2713-2641-2024-1118-43-56
  22. Volhonov M.S., Abalihin A.M., Krupin A.V. Justification of Design Parameters of a New Forage Grain Grinder. Bulletin NGIEI. 2020;11(114):5–16. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2227-9407-2020-10101
  23. Fataliev K.G., Mamedov I.O., Kuliev Z.V., Mamedov H.A., Zeynalov A.M., Mamedov D.A., et al. [Universal Feed Grinder]. Patent 2776311 Russian Federation. 2022 July 18. (In Russ.) Available at: https://findpatent.ru/patent/277/2776311.html (accessed 25.08.2024).

 

Licensed under a Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Joomla templates by a4joomla