DOI: 10.15507/2658-4123.034.202403.461-473
Critical Parameters of the Athermal Electroplastic Effect in Metallic Materials
Vladimir V. Stolyarov
Dr.Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Chief Researcher of Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences (4 Maly Kharitonievsky Lane, Moscow 101000, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8461-3888, Researcher ID: KAM-7131-2024, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract
Introduction. Plastic deformation and electric current, acting separately, usually have opposite effects on the deformation behavior and flow stresses in electrically conductive materials. In the case of the combined action of plastic deformation and applied electric current, the result is not pre predictable. The study of the synergistic effect of deformation and electric current can be used for metal forming.
Aim of the Study. The study is aimed at demonstrating the existence of impulse current threshold parameters at which the athermal electroplastic effect manifests itself in various materials.
Materials and Methods. Tensile tests were performed at various current modes, which exclude the increased contribution of the thermal effect to the reduction of flow stresses – current density and duty cycle. The fractographic features of the fracture surface were studied using raster scanning microscopy. There were found the threshold values of current parameters at which stress jumps associated with the electroplastic effect occur.
Results. The influence of the density and duty cycle of the impulse current on the manifestation of the electroplastic effect is shown. Both parameters have threshold values, above which the electroplastic effect becomes observable (at density j > jкр ) or athermal (at duty cycle Q > Qкр). All types of tension are accompanied by a viscous fracture and void formation, which is most intensively formed, when current is injected.
Discussion and Conclusion. In alloys with low electrical resistance, the threshold impulse current density corresponding to the occurrence of the electroplastic effect is higher than in alloys with high electrical resistance. Increasing the duty cycle of the impulse current reduces the temperature of the deformed sample that allows considering the electroplastic effect as athermal.
Keywords: tension, impulse current, current density, duty factor, fracture surface
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
For citation: Stolyarov V.V. Critical Parameters of the Athermal Electroplastic Effect in Metallic Materials. Engineering Technologies and Systems. 2024;34(3):461–473. https://doi.org/10.15507/2658-4123.034.202403.461-473
The author has read and approved the final manuscript.
Submitted 25.03.2024; revised 27.05.2024; accepted 03.06.2024
REFERENCES
1. Goldman P.D., Motowidlo L.R., Galligan J.M. The Absence of an Electroplastic Effect in Lead at 4.2K. Scripta Metallurgica. 1981;15(4):353–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/0036-9748(81)90208-8
2. Okazaki K., Kagawa M., Conrad H. An Evaluation of the Contributions of Skin, Pinch and Heating Effects to the Electroplastic Effect in Titanium. Materials Science and Engineering. 1980;45:(2)109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(80)90216-5
3. Troitskii O.A. [Electromechanical Effect in Metals]. Pisma v Zhurnal Experimentalnoi Teoriticheskoi Fiziki. 1969;10:18–20. (In Russ.) Available at: https://jetpletters.ru/ps/852/article_13061.pdf (accessed 10.03.2024).
4. Liu J., Jia D., Fu Y., Kong X., Lv Z., Zeng E., et al. Electroplasticity Effects: from Mechanism to Application. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2024;131:3267–3286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12072-y
5. Salandro W.A., Jones J.J., McNeal T.A., Roth J.T., Hong S.-T., Smith M.T. Effect of Electrical Pulsing on Various Heat Treatments of 5XXX Series Aluminum Alloys. International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference. 2008;1:283–292. https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC_ICMP2008-72512
6. Hu Y., Zhao H., Yu X., Li J., Zhang B., Li T. Research Progress of Magnetic Field Regulated Mechanical Property of Solid Metal Materials. Metals. 2022;12(11):1988. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12111988
7. Nguyen T.T., Nguyen T.V., Hong S.-T., Kim M.-J., Han H.N., Morestin F. The Effect of Short Duration Electric Current on the Quasi-Static Tensile Behavior of Magnesium AZ31 Alloy. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2016;9560413. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9560413
8. Dobras D., Zimniak Z., Zwierzchowski M. The Effect of Pulsed Electric Current on the Structural and Mechanical Behavior of 6016 Aluminium Alloy in Different States of Hardening. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. 2023;23:166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-023-00700-z
9. Dobras D., Bruschi S., Simonetto E., Rutkowska-Gorczyca M., Ghiotti A. The Effect of Direct Electric Current on the Plastic Behavior of AA7075 Aluminum Alloy in Different States of Hardening. Materials. 2021;14(1):73. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14010073
10. Troitskiy O.A. Electroplastic Effect on Metals. Annali D’Italia. 2021;26:60–73. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: PWRSOB
11. Kim M.-J., Yoon S., Park S., Jeong H.-J., Park J.-W., Kim K. Elucidating the Origin of Electroplasticity in Metallic Materials. Applied Materials Today. 2020;21:100874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100874
12. Lahiri A., Shanthraj P., Roters F. Understanding the Mechanisms of Electroplasticity from a Crystal Plasticity Perspective. Modeling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2019;27:085006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/ab43fc
13. Jiang B., Zhang D., Xu H., Liu Y., Cao Z., Yang X. Excellent Ductility in the Extruded AZ61 Magnesium Alloy Tube Induced by Electropulsing Treatment during Tension. Metals. 2021;11(5):813. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11050813
14. Wu C., Zhou Y.J., Liu B. Experimental and Simulated Investigation of the Deformation Behavior and Microstructural Evolution of Ti6554 Titanium Alloy During an Electropulsing-Assisted Microtension Process. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2022;838:142745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.142745
15. Stolyarov V.V., Misochenko A. A Pulsed Current Application to the Deformation Processing of Materials. Materials. 2023;16(18):6270. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186270
16. Yin F., Ma S., Hu S., Liu Y., Hua L., Cheng G.J. Understanding the Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Behavior of Titanium Alloy During Electrically Assisted Plastic Deformation Process. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2023;869:144815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2023.144815
17. Dyakonov G.S., Mironov S., Enikeev N., Semenova I.P., Valiev R.Z., Semiatin S.L. Annealing Behavior of Severely-Deformed Titanium Grade 4. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2019;742:89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.10.122
18. Klevtsov G.V., Valiev R.Z., Klevtsova N.A., Fesenyuk M.V., Tyurkov M.N., Polyakov A.V. Strength and Torsion Fracture Mechanism of Commercially Pure Titanium with Ultrafine-Grained Structure. Letters on Materials. 2021;3:273–278. https://doi.org/10.22226/2410-3535-2021-3-273-278
19. Pakhomov M.A., Savenkov G.G., Smakovsky M.A., Stolyarov V.V. Effect of Pulsed Current Duty Factor on Deformation Behavior of Aluminum Bronze. Metal Science and Heat Treatment. 2023;65:292–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11041-023-00928-9
20. Stolyarov V.V. Role of the Pulse Current Duty Cycle during Titanium Tension. Journal of Machinery Manufacture and Reliability. 2023;52(4):313–319. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3103/S1052618823040167 (accessed 10.03.2024).
21. Pakhomov M.A., Stolyarov V.V. Specific Features of Electroplastic Effect in Mono- and Polycrystalline Aluminum. Metal Science and Heat Treatment. 2021;63:236–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11041-021-00677-7
22. Conrad H. Electroplasticity in Metals and Ceramics. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2000;287(2):276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00786-3
23. Korolkov O.E., Pakhomov M.A., Stolyarov V.V. [The Electroplastic Effect in Titanium Alloys under Tension]. Industrial Laboratory. Diagnostics of Materials. 2022;88(10):73–82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2022-88-10-73-82
24. Wang X., Xu J., Shan D., Guo B., Cao J. Modeling of Thermal and Mechanical Behavior of a Magnesium Alloy AZ31 during Electrically-Assisted Micro-Tension. International Journal of Plasticity. 2016;85:230–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.07.008
25. Subrahmanyam A., Shivaprasad C., Suman G., Raju D.V., Rahul K.V., Venkata R.N. Importance of Machine Compliance to Quantify Electro-Plastic Effect in Electric Pulse Aided Testing: An Experimental and Numerical Study. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 2022;75:268–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.027
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.