DOI: 10.15507/2658-4123.032.202201.054-070
Calculation Methods of Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Distribution in Pig Manure Fractions
Ekaterina V. Shalavina
Leading Researcher at the Department of Engineering Ecology of Agricultural Production, Institute for Engineering and Environmental Problems in Agricultural Production ‒ Branch of Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM (3 Filtrovskoye Shosse, Saint Petersburg 196625, Russian Federation), Cand.Sci. (Engr.), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7345-1510, Researcher ID: C-1980-2018, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Roman A. Uvarov
Researcher at the Department of Engineering Ecology of Agricultural Production, Institute for Engineering and Environmental Problems in Agricultural Production ‒ Branch of Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM (3 Filtrovskoye Shosse, Saint Petersburg 196625, Russian Federation), Cand.Sci. (Engr), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2792-0136, Researcher ID: L-3047-2016, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Eduard V. Vasilev
Senior Researcher at the Department of Engineering Ecology of Agricultural Production, Institute for Engineering and Environmental Problems in Agricultural Production ‒ Branch of Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM (3 Filtrovskoye Shosse, Saint Petersburg 196625, Russian Federation), Cand.Sci. (Engr), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5910-5793, Researcher ID: C-1304-2018, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract
Introduction. The study aims to develop and test a comprehensive calculation methodology in a case study of pilot pig complexes to verify reliability of estimates. The methods are required for reliable tracking of the nutrients flow at the farm level and for adjusting the application doses of resulting solid and liquid organic fertilizers with due account for the crop rotation in place, agrochemical analysis of soils, and specific crops to obtain the target yields.
Materials and Methods. Calculations of the content of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in pig manure before separation and in resulting solid and liquid fractions were carried out by the developed method. At that, coefficients from corresponding normative documents and results of previous research were used. Samples of initial material were collected in three replications at two closed-cycle pig rearing complexes located in the Leningrad Region. The experimental data were statistically processed with StatGraphics Centurion v.16 software.
Results. The calculated nutrient content of the manure before separation and the separated solid and liquid fractions was compared with the results of laboratory analysis of the physicochemical composition of the manure and its fractions from the selected pig rearing complexes. The difference between the calculated and average actual values of all considered indicators did not exceed 10%, with the differences in nitrogen content turning out to be much bigger (up to 10%) than the differences in phosphorus content (up to 5.7%) in the solid and liquid fractions of pig manure.
Discussion and Conclusion. The identified differences can be explained by the instrumental uncertainty and heterogeneity of the analyzed initial material ‒ a mixture of excrement and process water. The results of the study confirmed that the developed method is reliable, and it can be used to account for the nutrients in the solid and liquid organic fertilizers in calculating and adjusting doses for certain crops to produce expected yield and reduce the negative impact on the environment.
Keywords: pig-rearing complex, manure, separation, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, solid fraction, liquid fraction
Acknowledgments: The authors are grateful to the editors and reviewers for their attentive attitude to the article and for the indicated remarks, which improved its quality.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
For citation: Shalavina E.V., Uvarov R.A., Vasilev E.V. Calculation Methods of Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Distribution in Pig Manure Fractions. Inzhenernyye tekhnologii i sistemy = Engineering Technologies and Systems. 2022; 32(1):54-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.15507/2658-4123.032.202201.054-070
Contribution of the authors:
E. V. Shalavina – development of methodology, calculations, sampling, comparison of results, laboratory analyses.
R. A. Uvarov – development of the structure of the article, literary review.
E. V. Vasilev – problem statement, development of methodology.
All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Submitted 20.10.2021; approved after reviewing 19.11.2021;
accepted for publication 15.12.2021
REFERENCES
1. Trifanov A.V., Kalyuga V.V., Bazykin V.I. Current State and Trends of Pork Production in the Russian Federation. Tekhnologii i tekhnicheskie sredstva mekhanizirovannogo proizvodstva produktsii rastenievodstva i zhivotnovodstva = Technologies and Technical Means of Mechanized Production of Crop and Livestock Products. 2016; 90:5-14. Available at: https://clck.ru/bNGaV (accessed 21.01.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Uvarov R., Briukhanov A., Shalavina E. Logistic Transport Model of Region-Scale Distribution of Organic Fertilizers. In: Proceedings of International Scientific Conference “Engineering for Rural Development” (23-25 May 2018). Jelgava; 2018. p. 270-277. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev2018.17.N301
3. Velthof G.L., Rietra R.P.J.J. Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Gaseous Nitrogen Losses from the Concentrated Liquid Fraction of Pig Slurries. International Journal of Agronomy. 2019. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9283106
4. Trifanov A.V., Bazykin V.I. Substantiation of Optimum Relative Moisture Content of Slurry When Applying the Batch-Type Gravity Flow System for Its Removal. Tekhnologii i tekhnicheskie sredstva mekhanizirovannogo proizvodstva produktsii rastenievodstva i zhivotnovodstva = Technologies and Technical Means of Mechanized Production of Crop and Livestock Products. 2018; 96:250-257. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.24411/0131-5226-2018-10080
5. Kariyama I.D., Zhai X., Wu B. Physical and Rheological Properties of Animal Manure: A Review. Transactions of the ASABE. 2018; 61(3):1113-1120. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.12768
6. Cocolo G., Hjorth M., Zarebska A., Provolo G. Effect of Acidification on Solid–Liquid Separation of Pig Slurry. Biosystems Engineering. 2016; 143:20-27. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.11.004
7. Ten Hoeve M., Gómez-Muñoz B., Jensen L.S., Bruun S. Environmental Impacts of Combining Pig Slurry Acidification and Separation under Different Regulatory Regimes – A Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Environmental Management. 2016; 181:710-720. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.028
8. Uvarov R.A. Survey of Solid Animal and Poultry Manure Processing Technologies Adapted to the North-West Federal District Conditions. Tekhnologii i tekhnicheskie sredstva mekhanizirovannogo proizvodstva produktsii rastenievodstva i zhivotnovodstva = Technologies and Technical Means of Mechanized Production of Crop and Livestock Products. 2017; 93:133-146. Available at: https://clck.ru/bNGqh (accessed 13.02.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Zhang R.H., Westerman P.W. Solid-Liquid Separation of Annual Manure for Odor Control and Nutrient Management. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 1997; 13(3):385-393. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.21614
10. Fangueiro D., Lopes C., Surgy S., Vasconcelos E. Effect of the Pig Slurry Separation Techniques on the Characteristics and Potential Availability of N to Plants in the Resulting Liquid and Solid Fractions. Biosystems Engineering. 2012; 113(2):187-194. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.07.006
11. Bachmann S., Uptmoor R., Eichler-Löbermann B. Phosphorus Distribution and Availability in Untreated and Mechanically Separated Biogas Digestates. Scientia Agricola. 2016; 73(1):9-17. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0069
12. Gomez-Munoz B., Case S.D.C., Jensen L.S. Pig Slurry Acidification and Separation Techniques Affect Soil N and C Turnover and N2O Emissions from Solid, Liquid and Biochar Fractions. Journal of Environmental Management. 2016; 168:236-244. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.12.018
13. Montminy M.P.L., Cloutier L., Couture C., et al. Revision of the Simplified Balance Method to Evaluate Phosphorus Excretion by Growing-Finishing Pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 2017; 95(2):130-131. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/asasmw.2017.271
14. Won S., You B.-G., Shim S., et al. Nutrient Variations from Swine Manure to Agricultural Land. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2018; 31(5):763-772. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0634
15. Nolan T., Troy S.M., Healy M.G., et al. Characterization of Compost Produced from Separated Pig Manure and a Variety of Bulking Agents at Low Initial C/N Ratios. Bioresource Technology. 2011; 102(14):7131-7138. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.066
16. Troy S.M., Nolan T., Kwapinski W., et al. Effect of Sawdust Addition on Composting of Separated Raw and Anaerobically Digested Pig Manure. Journal of Environmental Management. 2012; 111:70-77. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.035
17. Adeniyan O.N., Ojo A.O., Akinbode O.A., Adediran J.A. Comparative Study of Different Organic Manures and NPK Fertilizer for Improvement of Soil Chemical Properties and Dry Matter Yield of Maize in Two Different Soils. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management. 2011; 2(1):9-13. https://academicjournals.org/journal/JSSEM/article-full-text-pdf/0573C6210248.pdf (accessed 10.03.2021). (In Eng.)
18. Kowalski Z., Makara A., Fijorek K. Changes in the Properties of Pig Manure Slurry. Acta Biochimica Polonica. 2013; 60(4):845-850. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.18388/abp.2013_2070
19. Woli K.P., Rakshit S., Lundvall J.P., et al. On-Farm Evaluation of Liquid Swine Manure as a Nitrogen Source for Corn Production. Agronomy Journal. 2013; 105(1):248-262. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0292
20. Yagüe M.R., Bosch-Serra A.D., Antúnez M., Boixadera J. Pig Slurry and Mineral Fertilization Strategies’ Effects on Soil Quality: Macroaggregate Stability and Organic Matter Fractions. Science of the Total Environment. 2012; 438:218-224. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.063
21. Hjorth M., Christensen K.V., Christensen M.L., Sommer S.G. Solid-Liquid Separation of Animal Slurry in Theory and Practice. A Review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2010; 30(1):153-180. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009010
22. Makara A., Kowalski Z. Selection of Pig Manure Management Strategies: Case Study of Polish Farms. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018; 172:187-195. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.095
23. Ali B.M., van Zanten H.H.E, Berentsen P., et al. Environmental and Economic Impacts of Using Co-Products in the Diets of Finishing Pigs in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017; 162:247-259. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.041
24. Hou Y., Velthof G.L., Case S.D.C., et al. Stakeholder Perceptions of Manure Treatment Technologies in Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018; 172:1620-1630. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.162
25. Yuan Z., Pan X., Chen T., et al. Evaluating Environmental Impacts of Pig Slurry Treatment Technologies with a Life-Cycle Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018; 188:840-850. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.021
26.Makara A., Kowalski Z., Lelek L., Kulczycka J. Comparative Analyses of Pig Farming Management Systems Using the Life Cycle Assessment Method. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 241. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118305
27. Mikhailova О.А. Tendencies of the World Swine Breeding Development. Vestnik agrarnoy nauki = Bulletin of Agrarian Science. 2018; (1):36-45. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tendentsii-razvitiya-mirovogo-svinovodstva (accessed 26.03.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
28. Chistyakov G.V., Zhilyakov D.I. Analysis of the Pig Industry in the Framework of the State Programs of Development. Vestnik Kurskoy gosudarstvennoy selskokhozyaystvennoy akademii = Bulletin of the Kursk State Agricultural Academy. 2017; (5):73-77. Available at: https://clck.ru/bNHTM (accessed 27.03.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
29. Bryukhanov A.Yu., Vasilev E.V., Shalavina E.V., Uvarov R.A. Methods for Solving Environmental Problems in Livestock and Poultry Farming. Selskokhozyaystvennye mashiny i tekhnologii = Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2019; 13(4):32-37. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.22314/2073-7599-2019-13-4-32-37
30. Koynova A.N. [Innovative Solutions for Pig Farms]. Effektivnoe zhivotnovodstvo = Effective Livestock Production. 2019; (8):68-77. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/innovatsionnye-resheniya-dlyasvinokompleksov (accessed 28.03.2021). (In Russ.)
31. Kovalev N.G., Gridnev P.I., Gridneva T.T. Scientific Support for the Development of Environmentally Safed Systems of Manure Utilization. Agrarnaya nauka Yevro-Severo-Vostoka = Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2016; (1):62-69. Available at: https://clck.ru/bNHUt (accessed 31.03.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
32. Bazykin V.I., Trifanov A.V. [Manure Removal System Management Algorithm for Pig Farms]. Izvestiya Velikolukskoy gosudarstvennoy selskokhozyaystvennoy akademii = Proceedings of the Velikolukskaya State Agricultural Academy. 2017; (4):34-40. Available at: https://clck.ru/bNHVR (accessed 01.04.2021). (In Russ.)
33. Shalavina E., Briukhanov A., Uvarov R., Vasilev E. Forming of Environmentally Friendly Technologies of Pig Manure Utilization. In: Proceedings of International Scientific Conference “Engineering for Rural Development” (24-26 May 2017). Jelgava; 2017. p. 333-341. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev2017.16.N065
34. Gridnev P.I., Gridneva T.T. The Loss of Nitrogen at Various Technologies of Manure Storage and Preparation For Using. Vestnik VNIIMZh = Bulletin of the Russian Research Institute for Mechanization of Animal Husbandry. 2018; (4):111-120. Available at: https://clck.ru/bNHZ8 (accessed 03.04.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
35. Briukhanov A.Yu., Vasilev E.V., Shalavina E.V., Oblomkova N.S. Indicators of Negative Environmental Impact in Agri-Food Production. Tekhnologii i tekhnicheskie sredstva mekhanizirovannogo proizvodstva produktsii rastenievodstva i zhivotnovodstva = Technologies and Technical Means of Mechanized Production of Crop and Livestock Products. 2019; (2):250-260. Available at: https://clck.ru/bNHZm (accessed 05.04.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.