Print

PDF To download article.

UDK 620.22-419.8:620.178.7

DOI: 10.15507/2658-4123.030.202002.268-286

 

Improving the Shock Resistance of Agricultural Composite Units Using Visco-Elastic Fluids

 

Mikhail V. Astakhov
Professor of Chair of Wheeled Machines and Applied Mechanics, Kaluga Branch of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (2 Bazhenov St., Kaluga 248600, Russia), D.Sc. (Engineering), Publons ID: https://publons.com/researcher/3506719/mikhail-astakhov/, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8675-1611, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Ekaterina V. Slavkina
Assistant of Chair of Wheeled Machines and Applied Mechanics, Kaluga Branch of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (2 Bazhenov St., Kaluga 248600, Russia), Researcher ID: https://publons.com/researcher/3500176/ekaterina-slavkina, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5889-5957, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Introduction. The use of composite materials in agricultural engineering is known as one of the recommended ways to reduce the weight of the structure and protect against corrosion. The main disadvantages of such products are their low resistance to shock loads that occur during operation. The aim of this study is to develop a glass composite multi-layer structure of the trailer side, capable of withstanding shock loads along with statically applied forces, without including additional reinforcing metal elements in the zones of the possible impacts.
Materials and Methods. To increase the impact resistance of the product (after an analysis of modern design solutions) the use of visco-elastic non-Newtonian fluids based on polysilicon by introducing an additional layer into the power element to compensate for impact effects is proposed.
Results. On the basis of laboratory testing using statistical processing of the obtained data, the basic mechanical characteristics of non-Newtonian fluid (polysilicon) during impact tests (density, Poisson’s ratio, Young’s modulus, shear modulus) are determined, and graphs of the obtained dependencies are constructed. The temperature of the tested polysilicon samples did not significantly affect their mechanical properties. It is established that starting from the value of relative deformation 0.042, during the impact polysilicon shows linearly elastic properties.
Discussion and Conclusion. Based on the received mechanical characteristics, the conclusions about resistance to shock loads of polysilicon as a component of a trailer board element are made. The variant of arrangement of the trailer board structural solution as a multilayer sandwich element with external parts made of polymer composite material with internal filling with fiberglass cells and polysilicon placed in large cells is offered.

Keywords: shock loading, impact bending tests, sandwich composite construction, polysilicon, dilatant fluid, polymer composite material, impact viscosity

For citation: Astakhov M.V., Slavkina E.V. Improving the Shock Resistance of Agricultural Composite Units Using Visco-Elastic Fluids. Inzhenerernyye tekhnologii i sistemy = Engineering Technologies and Systems. 2020; 30(2):268-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2658-4123.030.202002.268-286

Contribution of the authors: M. V. Astakhov – task definition, scientific guidance, discussion of results, analysis of scientific literature; E. V. Slavkina – sample production, laboratory testing, statistical data processing.

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Received 13.11.2019; revised 16.12.2019; published online 30.06.2020

 

REFERENCES

1. Folding Board of the Truck Platform. Patent 1745600 USSR. Appl. 28.02.1990; publ. 07.07.1992. Bulletin No. 25. 4 p. (In Russ.)

2. Karaduman N.S., Karaduman Y., Ozdemir H., et al. Textile Reinforced Structural Composites for Advanced Applications. Textiles for Advanced Applications. 2017. Available at: https://www.intechopen.com/books/textiles-for-advanced-applications/textile-reinforced-structural-composites-for-advanced-applications (accessed 14.04.2020). (In Eng.)

3. Mavhungu S.T., Akinlabi E.T., Onitiri M.A., et al. Aluminum Matrix Composites for Industrial Use: Advances and Trends. In: International Conference on Sustainable Materials Processing and Manufacturing, SMPM. 2017; 7:178-182. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2016.12.045

4. Becenen N., Eker B., Sahin M. Mechanical Properties of Plastic Matrix Composite Materials Used in Tractor Bonnets. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2010; 29(24):3637-3644. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684410386990

5. Misirli C., Becenen N., Sahin M. An Investigation on Plastic Matrix Composite Materials. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014; 555:406-412. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.555.406

6. Valasek P., Kejval J., Muller M. Epoxy Resin Filled with Primary and Secondary Raw Material – Useable in Agriculture. Research in Agricultural Engineering. 2014; 60(4):165-171. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/23/2013-RAE

7. Sorokina I.I., Astakhov M.V. Prospects of Application of Polymer Composite Materials with Addition of Nanocrystalline Powders of Aluminium Oxide in Design and Repair of Agricultural Machinery. Trudy GOSNITI = Works of GOSNITI. 2012; 109(1):9-13. (In Russ.)

8. Vaidya U. Composites for Automotive, Truck and Mass Transit. Lancaster: DEStech Publications; 2011. 419 p. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288004403_Composites_for_Automotive_ Truck_and_Mass_Transit (accessed 14.04.2020). (In Eng.)

9. Figlus T., Koziol M., Kuczynski L. Impact of Application of Selected Composite Materials on the Weight and Vibroactivity of the Upper Gearbox Housing. Materials. 2019; 12(16):2517. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12162517

10. Cross R. Elastic and Viscous Properties of Silly Putty. American Journal of Physics. 2012; 80(10):870-875. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4732086

11. Cross R. Elastic Properties of Plasticine, Silly Putty, and Tennis Strings. The Physics Teacher. 2012; 50(9):527-529. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4767481

12. Golinelli N., Spaggiari A., Dragoni E. Mechanical Behavior of Magnetic Silly Putty: Viscoelastic and Magnetorheological Properties. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures. 2017; 28(8):953-960. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X15591655

13. Boland C.S., Khan U., Ryan G., et al. Sensitive Electromechanical Sensors Using Viscoelastic Graphene-Polymer Nanocomposites. Science. 2016; 354:1257-1260. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2879

14. Astakhov M.V. Application of Thin-Walled Structures in Agricultural Engineering. Traktory i selkhozmachiny = Tractors and Agricultural Machinery. 2003; (7):25-27. (In Russ.)

15. Astakhov M.V., Tagantsev T.V. Composite Materials in Agricultural Engineering. Traktory i selkhozmachiny = Tractors and Agricultural Machinery. 2004; (9):42-44. (In Russ.)

16. Fixing Element for Joining Parts Made of Laminated Polymer Composite Materials Based on Glass Fabrics and Synthetic Resin Matrixes with Metal Parts of Construction: Patent 182601 Russian Federation. Appl. 11.05.17; publ. 23.08.18. Bulletin No. 24. 6 p.

 

Лицензия Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.